CT-2.3

Dropout as a tool for understanding information distribution in human and machine visual systems

Jacob S. Prince, Harvard University, United States; Gabriel Fajardo, Boston College, United States; George A. Alvarez, Talia Konkle, Harvard University, United States

Session:
Contributed Talks 2 Lecture

Track:
Cognitive science

Location:
South Schools / East Schools

Presentation Time:
Sat, 26 Aug, 17:00 - 17:15 United Kingdom Time

Abstract:
Deep neural networks are useful for operationalizing high-level visual representation spaces that are governed by specific architectural, input, and learning constraints. An underexplored but highly relevant pressure on representation formation is the mode of regularization applied during training. Here, we train a set of models with parametrically varying dropout proportion (p) to induce systematically varying degrees of distributed information while controlling all other inductive biases. We find that increasing dropout produces an increasingly smooth, low-dimensional representational space. Optimal robustness to lesioning is observed at around 70% dropout, after which both accuracy and robustness decline. Representational comparison to data from occipitotemporal cortex in the Natural Scenes Dataset reveals that this optimal degree of dropout is also associated with maximal emergent neural predictivity. These results suggest that varying dropout may reveal an optimal point of balance between the efficiency of high-dimensional codes and the robustness of low dimensional codes in hierarchical vision systems.

Manuscript:
License:
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
DOI:
10.32470/CCN.2023.1649-0
Publication:
2023 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience
Presentation
Discussion
Resources
No resources available.
Session CT-2
CT-2.1: Mental Imagery: Weak Vision or Compressed Vision?
Tiasha Saha Roy, Jesse Breedlove, Ghislain St-Yves, Kendrick Kay, Thomas Naselaris, University of Minnesota, United States
CT-2.2: Leveraging Artificial Neural Networks to Enhance Diagnostic Efficiency in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Study on Facial Emotion Recognition
Kushin Mukherjee, University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States; Na Yeon Kim, California Institute of Technology, United States; Shirin Taghian Alamooti, York University, Canada; Ralph Adolphs, California Institite of Technology, United States; Kohitij Kar, York University, Canada
CT-2.3: Dropout as a tool for understanding information distribution in human and machine visual systems
Jacob S. Prince, Harvard University, United States; Gabriel Fajardo, Boston College, United States; George A. Alvarez, Talia Konkle, Harvard University, United States
CT-2.4: Humans and 3D neural field models make similar 3D shape judgements
Thomas O'Connell, MIT, United States; Tyler Bonnen, Stanford University, United States; Yoni Friedman, Ayush Tewari, Josh Tenenbaum, Vincent Sitzmann, Nancy Kanwisher, MIT, United States
CT-2.5: Humans and CNNs see differently: Action affordances are represented in scene-selective visual cortex but not CNNs
Clemens G. Bartnik, Iris I.A. Groen, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands
CT-2.6: Beyond Geometry: Comparing the Temporal Structure of Computation in Neural Circuits with Dynamic Mode Representational Similarity Analysis
Mitchell Ostrow, Adam Eisen, Leo Kozachkov, Ila Fiete, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States