Illusion of control differentially affects outcome predictions in pathological and recreational gamblers
Frederike H. Petzschner, Brown University, United States; Saee Paliwal, Benevolent AI, United Kingdom; Gina Paolini, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Switzerland; Stephanie Olaiya, Chloe Zimmerman, Brown University, United States; Nicole Zahnd, Helen Schmidt, Katharina Wellstein, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Switzerland; Ines Bodmer, Franz Eidenbenz, Karinna Schärli, Till Siegrist, Zentrum für Spielsucht und andere Verhaltenssüchte, Switzerland; Klaas Enno Stephan, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Switzerland
Session:
Contributed Talks 3 Lecture
Location:
South Schools / East Schools
Presentation Time:
Sun, 27 Aug, 11:45 - 12:00 United Kingdom Time
Abstract:
Disordered gambling is the first-ever disorder classified as a behavioural addiction, offering a unique model to study addiction mechanisms in the absence of neurotoxic effects from substances. Previous research suggests that maladaptive reward processing and altered perceptions of control may be key drivers in the development and persistence of gambling behaviour. However, the mechanisms that underlie this association are not well understood. In this study, we tested 43 pathological and 43 recreational gamblers using a naturalistic slot machine task which manipulated reward magnitude and illusion of control in a 2x2 factorial design. We also used a computational reinforcement learning model to examine differences in reward and control processing between addicted and recreational gamblers. Our findings suggest that reward and control have distinct effects on gambling behaviour, with reward magnitude primarily influencing bet behaviour, while illusions of control additionally influence the anticipation of winning. This distortion of expected odds due to an illusion of control may drive continued gambling despite unfavourable outcomes and enhanced risk-taking. Moreover, the illusion of control differentially affected pathological and recreational gamblers and may thus provide a window into the nature of risk-taking across gamblers.